LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Samuel Rogers and his Contemporaries
Sir George Beaumont to Samuel Rogers, 13 November 1826
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Vol. I Contents
Chapter I. 1803-1805.
Chapter II. 1805-1809.
Chapter III. 1810-1812.
Chapter IV. 1813-1814.
Chapter V. 1814-1815.
Chapter VI. 1815-1816.
Chapter VII. 1816-1818.
Chapter VIII. 1818-19.
Chapter IX. 1820-1821.
Chapter X. 1822-24.
Chapter XI. 1825-1827.
Vol. II Contents
Chapter I. 1828-1830.
Chapter II. 1831-34.
Chapter III. 1834-1837.
Chapter IV. 1838-41.
Chapter V. 1842-44.
Chapter VI. 1845-46.
Chapter VII. 1847-50.
Chapter VIII. 1850
Chapter IX. 1851.
Chapter X. 1852-55.
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
‘Coleorton Hall: 13 Nov., 1826.

‘My dear Rogers,—By the time, or perhaps before, you receive this, Lord Hastings’s library will be in the hands of Mr. Robins for sale. This was privately communicated to me, and as I thought there might be some things in it which you might wish to possess, I thought it not amiss to give you this hint in case you might choose to negotiate before the sale.

‘I confess your observation upon parapets seems at first sight a “palpable hit, egad,” but you mistake. I am no enemy to reasonable parapets, but I do not like to see a bridge overloaded; the guards, for instance, of the Simplon are not more than half a yard in height, and I never heard them complained of as insufficient—indeed, when a horse is alarmed nothing can protect you, and I rather think a moderate fence better than a very high one, because the animal can see his danger. Now, I hope I have parried this severe thrust, but whatever sentence you may pass upon me I shall not cease to do justice to your quick philanthropy, and should I survive you, which is not very likely, it shall not be my fault if you are not placed side by side with Howard (not him of Corby, though a very humane man) in the cathedral-church of St. Paul’s. In the meantime I recommend for safety Westminster Bridge in preference to Waterloo.

‘I have just received Ottley’s catalogue, which I like very much on the whole. I hope you approve of it. The N. Poussin is well done, although I cannot agree
440 ROGERS AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES  
with him in supposing the trees are intended for evergreen oaks, they are far more like the chestnut; but, in fact, his general practice is only to make the grand distinctions and not enter into the detail of ashes, elms, &c., which I, who am passionately fond of the heroic style of landscape, cannot but approve; to have given the beautiful variety of
Claude would have been inconsistent with his plan, it would be like introducing silks and satins into the cartoons. I think he might have said a little more of the Rubens; he should, for instance, have introduced the fowler and his dog, both glowing with congenial instinct, and as animals much upon a par. Have you Bowles’s poem? I wish you would show it to him. Am I giving you too much trouble in requesting you to talk with him on the subject? It would save him the trouble of a letter. Only assure him I am highly pleased with his work on the whole. I could almost wish he had said nothing derogatory of Rembrandt. Fuseli adored him, and thought the sublimity of his light and shadow made ample amends for his occasional vulgarities, the unlucky prejudices of his country. On the whole I have heard him say: Rembrandt’s genius was equal to any, and that by his magic power he could make a dunghill “subloim.” We expect Mrs. Siddons to-day!! and Lord and Lady Lonsdale in the course of the week. Now, if you were man enough to join the party, how I should admire you. Lady B. is flattered by your remembrance, and I must thank you again and again for our delightful tour.

‘But I am afraid I have bored you so much with
ROGERS AND TOM MOORE441
this long letter you will never forgive me. Come and set my mind at ease.

‘Ever truly yours,
G. H. Beaumont.

‘Do you know anything of Charles Mills, the editor of the travels of Ducas. We have been much entertained by the book, although it would have been more agreeable, I think, if he had given it more of the tone of the times. Excuse repetitions, &c. I write in haste.’