LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoirs of the Rev. Samuel Parr
Ch. XXVIII. 1800-1807
Samuel Parr to William Roscoe, 25 January 1799
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

PREFACE
Vol. I CONTENTS
Ch. I. 1747-1752
Ch. II. 1752-1761
Ch. III. 1761-1765
Ch. IV. 1765-1766
Ch. V. 1767-1771
Ch. VI. 1771
Ch. VII. 1771-1776
Ch. VIII. 1771-1776
Ch. IX. 1776-1777
Ch. X. 1779-1786
Ch. XI. 1779-1786
Ch. XII. 1779-1786
Ch. XIII. 1780-1782
Ch. XIV. 1786-1789
Ch. XV. 1786-1790
Ch. XVI. 1776-1790
Ch. XVII. 1787
Ch. XVIII. 1789
Ch. XIX. 1790-1792
Ch. XX. 1791-1792
Ch. XXI. 1791-1796
Ch. XXII. 1794-1795
Ch. XXIII. 1794
Ch. XXIV. 1794-1800
Ch. XXV. 1794-1800
Ch. XXVI. 1800-1803
Ch. XXVII. 1801-1803
Ch. XXVIII. 1800-1807
Vol. II Contents
Ch I. 1800-1807
Ch II. 1807-1810
Ch III. 1809
Ch IV. 1809-1812
Ch V. 1810-1813
Ch VI. 1811-1815
Ch VII. 1812-1815
Ch VIII. 1816-1820
Ch IX. 1816-1820
Ch X. 1816-1820
Ch XI. 1816-1820
Ch XII. 1816-1820
Ch XIII. 1816-1820
Ch XIV. 1819
Ch XV. 1820-1821
Ch XVI. 1816-1820
Ch XVII. 1820-1824
Ch XVIII. 1820-1824
Ch XIX. 1820-1824
Ch XX. 1820-1825
Ch XXI.
Ch XXII.
Ch XXIII.
Ch XXIV.
Ch XXV.
Appendix
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 

“Dear Sir,—You and I have read and rejected many a grave definition of man; and if the failure
LIFE OF DR. PARR.443
of others were not sufficient to deter us from attempts to define, we should hardly, on such a question, observe the three laws which logicians produce, as indispensably necessary to a just definition. But we can describe what is prominent, or even peculiar, in species and in individuals; and can you, after all your variety of research, and with all your fertility of conception, point out a more proper term for man than a procrastinating animal? Such is man—and such have I been. Mr. C—— left
your book at Birmingham, while I was rambling about Wales. In the beginning of October I received it, at Birmingham. I brought it to Hatton. I read it twice—I liked it exceedingly—I determined, again and again, to write to you—I have been busy—I have been vexed—I have been idle—I have remembered, and remembered my resolution again and again; and again and again I have neglected to execute it. Your kind letter, and even the sight of your hand-writing, have roused me from my delirium. Tansillo interested me even by his subject. The short but pithy life you have prefixed, sent me to the book with yet stronger emotions. I read, and was delighted with his tenderness, his just indignation, his deep observation upon character, his earnest and most expressive expostulations. A mother I am not; and yet if I were, and had sinned against his laws, such a monitor would have awakened me to repentance. I am a man and a father, and a diligent and anxious observer of what passes in the earlier stages of what you and I consider education, &c. &c.

S. Parr.”
Jan. 25, 1799.