LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoirs of the Rev. Samuel Parr
Ch. XI. 1779-1786
Samuel Parr to Richard Taylor, [1814?]
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

PREFACE
Vol. I CONTENTS
Ch. I. 1747-1752
Ch. II. 1752-1761
Ch. III. 1761-1765
Ch. IV. 1765-1766
Ch. V. 1767-1771
Ch. VI. 1771
Ch. VII. 1771-1776
Ch. VIII. 1771-1776
Ch. IX. 1776-1777
Ch. X. 1779-1786
Ch. XI. 1779-1786
Ch. XII. 1779-1786
Ch. XIII. 1780-1782
Ch. XIV. 1786-1789
Ch. XV. 1786-1790
Ch. XVI. 1776-1790
Ch. XVII. 1787
Ch. XVIII. 1789
Ch. XIX. 1790-1792
Ch. XX. 1791-1792
Ch. XXI. 1791-1796
Ch. XXII. 1794-1795
Ch. XXIII. 1794
Ch. XXIV. 1794-1800
Ch. XXV. 1794-1800
Ch. XXVI. 1800-1803
Ch. XXVII. 1801-1803
Ch. XXVIII. 1800-1807
Vol. II Contents
Ch I. 1800-1807
Ch II. 1807-1810
Ch III. 1809
Ch IV. 1809-1812
Ch V. 1810-1813
Ch VI. 1811-1815
Ch VII. 1812-1815
Ch VIII. 1816-1820
Ch IX. 1816-1820
Ch X. 1816-1820
Ch XI. 1816-1820
Ch XII. 1816-1820
Ch XIII. 1816-1820
Ch XIV. 1819
Ch XV. 1820-1821
Ch XVI. 1816-1820
Ch XVII. 1820-1824
Ch XVIII. 1820-1824
Ch XIX. 1820-1824
Ch XX. 1820-1825
Ch XXI.
Ch XXII.
Ch XXIII.
Ch XXIV.
Ch XXV.
Appendix
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 

“Dear Sir,—You fall into the same misconceptions, which I have often found in other men of very good sense, by wishing to introduce into an inscription, matter, which is more adapted to biography.”—“Excellent as may be the books which Dr. Taylor wrote in the retired situation, of which you speak, we must be content with what I have generally said of him, as a learned man.”—“Dr. Taylor was, I doubt not, a sincere and strenuous advocate for liberty, civil and religious. But he is not much known to the public, by his political tenets; and on looking at the epitaph, I find that the mention of those tenets would most offensively derange the order, in which I have enumerated his moral qualities, his literary performances, his pastoral labours, and that theology which made him a defender of simple and uncorrupted religion.”—“I hesitated a little about inserting the year, in which the chapel was founded; and a chapel it is called by those, who frequent it; and a chapel I shall continue to call it. You non-cons have done well to exchange the word meeting-house for chapel;

1 The writer had once the pleasure of introducing to the hospitalities of Hatton Parsonage another descendant of this learned divine, Edgar Taylor, Esq. of London. Dr. Parr was pleased with his guest, and talked to him much, in a high panegyrical strain, of his great ancestor; expatiating on the virtues of his character, the depth of his learning, and the value of his writings.

138MEMOIRS OF THE
and as chapel is less dignified than church, we lofty and dignified ecclesiastics will permit you to make some approach to our holy phraseology. Improper it cannot be to specify the year. But why is it necessary? Let the naughty heretics put up a stone on the front of their chapel, with a date to perpetuate the memory of the time when it was built. This surely is a more proper way than slipping the date into the inscription.”—“My ears tingled, and the terrors of the spiritual court seized me, when I found myself describing the impugner of original sin as a vigorous defender of simple and uncorrupted religion.1 This may be very true; and if I had not thought so, I should not have said so. But the two houses of convocation might anathematise me for my rashness, heterodoxy, impiety, &c. &c.—I am, &c.
S. Parr.”