LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Charles Webb Le Bas to Francis Hodgson, 5 January 1849
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Vol. 1 Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II. 1794-1807.
Chapter III. 1807-1808.
Chapter IV. 1808.
Chapter V. 1808-1809.
Chapter VI. 1810.
Chapter VII. 1811.
Chapter VIII. 1811.
Chapter IX. 1811.
Chapter X. 1811-12.
Chapter XI. 1812.
Chapter XII. 1812-13.
Chapter XIII. 1813-14.
Vol. 2 Contents
Chapter XIV. 1815-16.
Chapter XV. 1816-18.
Chapter XVI. 1815-22.
Chapter XVII. 1820.
Chapter XVIII. 1824-27.
Chapter XIX. 1827-1830
Chapter XX. 1830-36.
Chapter XXI. 1837-40.
Chapter XXII. 1840-47.
Chapter XXIII. 1840-52.
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
Brighton: January 5, 1849.

My dear Mr. Provost,—Here we all are by God’s mercy safely launched upon the voyage of 1849. Let us venture to hope that the navigation may be rather less perilous than that of 1847 and 1848. It would appear from the recent job of President-making that the heart of France is not, after all, quite so thoroughly republicanised and deroyalised
308 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
as we imagined in February last. The Republic is not in the heart of France, but in the frenzied brain of the red-capped and red-handed maniacs of Paris.

What is to be the issue of it all? Another Restoration, if we may believe a French Vicomte whom I met some time since, and who said that there must, he feared, be terrible havoc and bloodshed before Henri Cinq should recover the throne of his ancestors; not appearing to entertain the faintest doubt that the recovery will take place, sooner or later; that he seemed to consider as a booked thing.

All the world is mad after the two volumes of the mighty Tom Macaulay; as mad as the opera-going and concert-going world is after Jenny Lind. I have not yet seen the thumping twins. To say the truth, I am haunted by certain misgivings. Will the mighty Tom be able to ‘clear his mind of cant’—the cant of Liberalism? Is there not something of mocking devil always at his elbow? Will the Church of England get anything like justice at his hand? His strength may be gigantic, but is he not likely to use it too much ‘like a giant’? I am apt to distrust a man so destitute as he has shown himself of all reverential
THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON A THEOLOGIAN.309
feeling. . . . .
Hawtrey’s visit to Brighton appears to have ‘rapt him in measureless content.’

Your mention of Fleming reminds me of what I have heard recently, with great astonishment, that the Duke 1 has taken hotly to theology; that he holds post-prandial discussions on the Athanasian symbol, and turns out as a sturdy Defender of the Faith; nay, that he is actually mighty in the Prophecies. Now, only think of the Iron Man deep in Apocalyptics! Don Juan’s marble man sitting down to supper with him is scarcely more wonderful. Melbourne, they say, was latterly a great reader of Divinity. But, old ‘Up Guards and at ’em,’ one can hardly imagine such a thing! Saul among the prophets was nothing to this!