LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Reminiscences of a Literary Life
CHAP. XIII
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

INTRODUCTION
PREFACE
CONTENTS
CHAP. I
SHELLEY
CHAP. II
JOHN KEATS
THOMAS CAMPBELL
CHAP. III
GEORGE DOUGLAS
CHAP. IV
WILLIAM STEWART ROSE
CHAP. V
SAMUEL ROGERS
SAMUEL COLERIDGE
CHAP. VI
HARTLEY COLERIDGE
CHAP. VII
THOMAS MOORE
WILLIAM LISLE BOWLES
CHAP. VIII
THOMAS DE QUINCEY
JAMES MATHIAS
CHAP. IX
MISS MARTINEAU
WILLIAM GODWIN
CHAP. X
LEIGH HUNT
THOMAS HOOD
HORACE SMITH
CHAP. XI
SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH
MRS. JAMESON
JANE AND ANNA PORTER
CHAP. XII
TOM GENT
‣ CHAP. XIII
VISCOUNT DILLON
SIR LUMLEY SKEFFINGTON
JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE
CHAP. XIV
LORD DUDLEY
LORD DOVER
CHAP. XV
SIR THOMAS LAWRENCE
WILLIAM BROCKEDON
CHAP. XVI
SIR ROBERT PEEL
SPENCER PERCEVAL
CHAP. XVII
MOUNTSTUART ELPHINSTONE
MR. DAVIS
CHAP. XVIII
ELIJAH BARWELL IMPEY
CHAP. XIX
ALEXANDER I.
GEORGE CANNING
NAPOLEON
QUEEN HORTENSE
ROSSINI
CHAP. XX
COUNT PECCHIO
MAZZINI
COUNT NIEMCEWITZ
CHAP. XXI
CARDINAL RUFFO
CHAP. XXII
PRINCESS CAROLINE
BARONNE DE FEUCHÈRES
CHAP. XXIII
SIR SIDNEY SMITH
CHAP. XXIV
SIR GEORGE MURRAY
CHAP. XXV
VISCOUNT HARDINGE
CHAP. XXVI
REV. C. TOWNSEND
CHAP. XXVII
BEAU BRUMMELL
CHAP. XXVIII
AN ENGLISH MERCHANT
THE BRUNELS
APPENDIX
INDEX
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
CHAPTER XIII
VISCOUNT DILLON

On the fly-leaf of a copy of his lordship’s wild poem “Eccelino da Romano,” I have written:

“I have preserved this wild book out of regard for the memory of its author. Poor Lord Dillon! His eccentricities bordered on insanity, but he was kind to me, in my youth, and in a foreign land, where, as yet, I had all my friends to make.”

I first knew him at Florence, when that fair city, rather full of English, was ringing with stories of his eccentricities, and with the fame of his daughter’s beauty. He was frank, fearless, very capricious; but, as I believed, a generous, warm-hearted man. The worst of his eccentricities was a total disbelief in Christianity, or in any revealed religion—a sort of jumbling mad-reasoning materialism. And with him materialism was a very different and a much more withering and repulsive thing than it was with poor Shelley.

There was an epigram in circulation in the English part of society in Florence; I know not who wrote it, nor am I quite sure that I retain the lines correctly, but they were something like these:
Dillon, go home! Consult thy daughter’s looks,
Peruse them well, and burn thy atheist books.
Read in those angel eyes and heavenly face
That there’s a God—then supplicate His grace.”

Florence was almost raving about the beautiful Miss Dillon. Travelling much abroad, out of the way of English newspapers, and never being much
CHAP. XIII]LADY STANLEY127
addicted to the perusal of births and marriages, I never knew until the other day that this charming person is wife to
Lord Stanley of Alderley, cousin to my accomplished friend and kindest benefactor, the Rev. A. P. Stanley, and mother of Mr. Stanley, late of the Foreign Office, and now chargi d’affaires at Athens, a very clever young man, a Chinese scholar, an accomplished philologist, and a great admirer of my old, learned, and most ingenious friend, Edwin Norris.

But, being violently a philo-Turk, the young diplomatist was no friend to me or to my books about Turkey. Perhaps here I ought to have used the past tense, as before he had been a month at Constantinople he agreed that all I had said about that pandemonium was strictly true, and as he has now been living more than three years in the Levant, he must have greatly modified his philo-Turkism. I should always have towards him a warm corner of the heart on account of his maternal grandfather and the heavenly face of his mother, whom I have never seen since her Florentine days; or, if I have seen her, I have done so without recognizing her. How often does this happen! One passes in the streets, or in some crowded place of resort, a person in whom one was so deeply interested some thirty or forty years ago; one may stand side by side with such a person, in a state of the most perfect indifference, not knowing her or him—as the case may be—and not having the least consciousness of the presence of such a person. Then, in England, if one had, what could one say or do? After such a deluge of years, at least two or three reintroductions would be requisite.

Her ladyship’s mother appeared to be a quiet, amiable, domestic woman; but I was told that she had, mixed with good common sense, a fair share of wit. One of the many subjects with which Lord Dillon, who would not take the Scriptural version, delighted
128VISCOUNT DILLON [CHAP. XIII
to cudgel his brain and to perplex those of other people, was the Origin of Evil. One evening at the
Prince of I.’s, when she was with him, he rode this hobby at a most wearisome rate. Her ladyship, quite worn out, said smartly but not ill-humouredly: “Dillon, I know the origin of my evil. It was in marrying a metaphysician like you!”

SIR LUMLEY ST. GEORGE SKEFFINGTON
(1771-1850)

I knew, by sight, this rhyming, playgoing, comedy-writing, philandering baronet, in the years 1813 and 1814. I used to see him at the theatres, in the Park, or lounging in Bond Street. I was a boy at the time, and much addicted to rhyming and playgoing myself. He was first pointed out to my notice as a literary and dramatic celebrity, and as a London lion, by a lady who wrote occasional verses, and who had once written a tragedy, which, in the parlance of John Wilson the poet, had been “particularly d——d.” His fame was now on the decline, for Scott, Moore, Byron, and others were in the field; but a few years before, and from about 1790 to 1809, the Baronet had been considered a star of the first magnitude.

Dear me! How easy it was for a man to get into reputation as an author in those days, especially if he had a bit of a handle to his name, an entrée in Society, a fashionable friend or two, and money to carry on the war for a while! My authoress still called him “the celebrated Skeffington.” He had begun by acting in private theatricals, and by inditing
“Songs and sonnets and rustical madrigals.
Made out of nothing and whistled on reeds.”

But these things had been declared to be charming, musical, exquisite; and the bard had worn laurels
CHAP. XIII]SKEFFINGTON’S PLAYS129
enough to conceal his baldness. Afterwards he had written some half-dozen comedies, and had produced a very telling melodrama, “
The Sleeping Beauty,” all of which have long been forgotten. Even then he seemed, in my juvenile eyes, a battered, shattered, made-up old beau, wearing false teeth, a portentous and most artificial wig, and was suspected of painting his cheeks. He was styled “of Skeffington Hall, Leicestershire,” but he had nothing of the Leicestershire baronet about him. He was thoroughly a Cockney; born in one suburb of London (St. Pancras), educated in Hackney, he lived many years in Southwark, and passed nearly all the rest of his time in the purlieus of Covent Garden and Drury Lane. His father, the first baronet, was a Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army, Ferral by name, but he took the surname and arms of Skeffington, by Royal Warrant, in 1772. I thought “old Skeff” must have been dead long ago, when one evening in 1831, as I entered Drury Lane Theatre with H., who knew the whole theatrical world, and two ladies, we met the Baronet in the lobby, to all appearance not very much the worge for seventeen years more wear. H. accosted him with the familiarity of old acquaintanceship; “Old Lummy,” “old Skeff,” or “old Sleeping Beauty,” for he had these nicknames and many more, was not the man to hurry from two pretty women; he buttonholed my friend, got into talk, and H. presented him to the ladies, and me to him. He was as gallant as an old French marquis of the ancien régime.

He left us to go behind the scenes and into the Green Room, where he had an appointment of importance; and we went into Lady Holland’s private box, graciously lent to me by her ladyship for that evening. I expressed my astonishment at the apparition I had seen in the lobby. “Oh!” said H., “old Skeff is much as he was fifteen years ago, except that he stoops a little more, and wears a wig
130SIR LUMLEY SKEFFINGTON [CHAP. XIII
made not of human hair but of black horse-hair, to which he attributes many advantages both of comfort and appearance. He must be getting on to seventy, but he still plays the young man, and his heart and head seem to be as young as ever.” Presently we saw old Lum in the stage-box, at the opposite side of the theatre, now leering at the actresses on the stage, now ogling the ladies in the dress-circle and the private boxes, and now frequently standing up, projecting his horse-hair wig, and bowing to some gentleman or kissing his hand, more antico, to some lady or ladies.

Next to the actors and actresses, he was making himself the most conspicuous person in the house. Before long he was up in our box, and making downright love to Miss ——, who had great difficulty in preventing herself from laughing in his face, as he was so outré, and she could not help thinking of the horse-hair wig. He then rattled on, like one who has lived la vie des coulisses, about this actress and that, and this Green-Room quarrel and that other, and how Mrs. —— became too soon jealous of Miss ——, and thwarted her in her parts, and how Sir T. stood by Mrs. ——, and how Lord —— took the part of Miss ——, and got the parties reconciled in the presence of the stage-manager and half a dozen of the proprietors. He seemed to know all the traditions of the Green Room, and all its tattle and bickerings for the last half-century. This was not unamusing, but it did not bear thinking of afterwards.

To be so old, and yet so trivial! To have lived so long in the world, and to have one’s head stuffed full of nothing but this, and “tags” of play-speeches and rhymes! To be so bent, shrunk, and withered, and yet never to think of death! Was there no honest rector, no zealous curate, no thoughtful friend, to tell him that he had an immortal soul, however little he might think of it, and to say to him, “Go to your prayers, old man!” Yet the Baronet lived a
CHAP. XIII]SATIRIZED BY BYRON131
good nineteen years after this, not dying until 1850, when he was in his eighty-fourth or eighty-fifth year. He was one of a good many examples I have known, that late hours and other irregularities of life do not, of necessity, or in all cases, abridge the duration of human existence. As the theatres declined, or as I lost my taste for that kind of amusement, I seldom again saw
old Skeff, who I believe was to be found almost to the last at some playhouse or other.

I met him one morning at old Andrews’ library in Bond Street; another day I met him walking towards one of the theatres with Liston the comedian, and the last time I saw him was about the time of Her Majesty’s marriage with Prince Albert. At this period he was bent almost double, but the horsehair wig was on his head and the rouge on his cheeks, and he was as frivolous as ever. The exoterics had been accustomed to call him a dandy. A great mistake! for his style and manners were reprobated by Brummell, Mildmay, and all the set, who pronounced old Skeff to be a quizzical guy. For the last forty years of his life he was quite unfashionable, and pretty well confined to the society of actors and actresses, and of a few young men of fashion, like my friend H., who had a mania for the stage and for private theatricals.

Old Skeff, who would dangle about fifty women at a time, was not the man to marry, and in him the baronetcy became extinct. He was thought of sufficient consequence to be satirized by Byron in “English and Scotch Reviewers,” by Tommy Moore in his “Twopenny Post-bag,” and by the Smiths in their “Rejected Addresses.” Though often in debt, he had never known the pangs or the actual pressure of poverty, and the last twenty years of his life he is said to have had a free income of from £600 to £800 a year. I have seen it stated that he was the author of that rich piece of burlesque, “Bombastes
132SIR LUMLEY SKEFFINGTON [CHAP. XIII
Furioso,” which still keeps possession of the stage; but I rather doubt the fact. His “
Sleeping Beauty” had a wonderful run. Though so unmanly and so frivolous, I never heard of poor old Lummy doing any great harm, and he was said to have been always amiable and good-natured. There were much worse men, in his time.

I think I have hinted that my acquaintance, fat old Andrews the bookseller, circulating library keeper, and opera-box letter, of Bond Street, was a bon vivant. He was a dreadful gourmand.

On the day when he was dying, and would not believe it, he ordered some fresh cod for his dinner. A servant took the dish to his bedside; he eyed it, missed the savoury bits, exclaimed in an excited manner “Where’s the sounds?” dropped his head on the pillow, and so died.

THE RT. HON. JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE

I have known in my time a good many very absent-minded men, but never one that came near to this wit, poet, and diplomat manqué. I knew him at Malta in 1827, and received much kindness from him. He would dine at the same table and have long talks with you to-day, and would not know you if you met him in the streets to-morrow. If he called you by your right name in the morning, he would be pretty sure to call you by a wrong one in the afternoon or evening. Worse still, he would invite you to dinner, forget all about it, and have dined, or be dining, when you got to his house at La Pietà. If anything were told to him that was on no account to be repeated, he was almost sure to tell it to the first friend or acquaintance he met. His scholarship, his wit, his poetry, and perhaps most of all his school fellowship with George Canning, got him into diplomacy; the profession for which, of all others, he was
CHAP. XIII]SIR JOHN MOORE133
by nature, habit, and an incurable infirmity, about the least fitted.

He ought to have been a country parson with a good fat living, or the Dean of a Cathedral, though I fear that even in such a post he must have committed himself through his propensity to let his head go a-wool-gathering. The history of his embassy to Madrid, and his conduct there in 1808-09, which completely deceived Sir John Moore, and led to the disastrous retreat to Corunna, cannot be forgotten nor recalled without pain, nor without regret that he should have been diplomatically employed in such a country. In Spain, he was disqualified not only by his absent-mindedness, but by a blind uncalculating enthusiasm for the Spaniards—a malady which his friend Southey shared with him. He was very fond of Spanish literature, particularly its poetry. He had gained great reputation as a youth by a spirited translation of the “Cid”; he took the Spaniards to be as heroical as in the days of the Campeador, and he appears to have taken every Spanish Don or General for a real Cid.

He kept dreaming on, on the banks of the Manzanares, while the English army, abandoned by his Spanish heroes, was getting into terrible difficulties; and he did not awake until Moore was killed, and his army re-embarked for Portugal. It was Frere who, by his mistaken representations and earnest entreaties, induced our Government to order Sir John’s advance upon Madrid. This was a responsibility from which the diplomatist could never be cleared. It was a mistake, a blunder; but Frere would remain less inexcusable if, after our retreat, he had not, to cover himself, accused Moore, as brave a soldier as ever drew sword, of something very like cowardice, as well as of indecision and want of military ability. This last was a black spot on Frere’s scutcheon, but I believe the only one that was ever there. When the Duke took command of our forces in the Penin-
134JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE [CHAP. XIII
sula, he said to a friend: “I hope the Government will remove that wit and poet from Madrid, and send a man who doesn’t dream, and has common sense, to supply his place!”

Government sent the Duke’s own brother, the Marquis Wellesley; and Frere retired on a comfortable ambassadorial pension, and the honours of a “Right Honourable.” He was never employed again, either diplomatically or otherwise, and never wished to be so. He fell back upon his books, and upon his rhymes, pleasant fancies, jests, and drolleries; and there he had few rivals. Not long after the peace he married the Dowager Countess of Errol, who had a comfortable jointure. Her ladyship soon began to suffer from asthma. After trying many places, she fancied that what suited her best was the island of Malta; and there they fixed themselves, remained many years without once quitting it, and there they both died and lie interred. Numerous were their deeds of charity; and great, and to some extent lasting, was the good done at Malta by Lady Errol and her poet. Her ladyship, in conjunction at first with the Marchioness of Hastings and her daughters, and then with Lady Emily Ponsonby, got together money enough to form a place of retreat for many aged and infirm Maltese, and to establish an industrial school, where children of both sexes were educated and brought up to be useful and gain their own honest livelihood. Lady Errol was the greatest benefactress of these institutions, for she gave to them not only her money but a great deal of her time and attention.

That pest of revolting mendicity and street begging, which had so troubled all strangers, had begun almost to disappear, when those who founded the almshouses and the school were recalled to England or removed by death, and when our reforming Whig ministry persisted in sending out reforming governors and systematizing commissioners, who chilled,
CHAP. XIII]HIS LIFE IN MALTA135
checked, and threw back the fountain streams of spontaneous charity and voluntary contribution, and failed to supply their place with other waters.

In 1847-48, I thought I saw more beggars in Valetta than I had ever seen there before. One of the most active of Lady Errol’s helpers was poor Lady Flora Hastings, second daughter to the Marquis, who died in his government and was buried in Malta in the year 1826. There were some Maltese not destitute of gratitude, for in 1827 I found, nearly every morning, the grave strewed with fresh flowers.

The Marquis was succeeded by General Sir Frederic Ponsonby, one of the most distinguished of our Waterloo heroes, who remained until 1830, when Ministers, who wanted his place for a Whig, recalled him. With these two Governors the poet and his lady were in the closest intimacy and confidence; and they, as well as the whole island, had a happy time while this régime lasted, and while as yet our reformers had not turned the heads and alienated the affections of the Maltese people by giving them liberty of the Press, the right of choosing their magistrates and judges, and by making other concessions which never should have been made to such a people, placed in such circumstances.

Rose thought that now Frere must be driven home to England—an event which he heartily desired—and that with his strong Toryism he would never be able to stand these new Governors, these Commissioners, and all that Whig and Radical inundation which set in as soon as Earl Grey got to the helm and had command of the sluice-gates.

But Lady Errol fancied she could not live elsewhere, and the poet took to thinking of something else; not, as I fancy, that he had ever bestowed very much thought upon politics since quitting diplomacy and his country. Year after year I continued to receive by letter, or to hear, some account or other of his eccentricity, absent-mindedness, and
136JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE [CHAP. XIII
active benevolence. With a little more industry, or only a little more steadiness of purpose, he might have done more justice to himself, and have written a great deal more; but on the whole, he must have passed a very happy, or at least a very easy, quiet, dreamy life. He has left enough behind him to secure a permanent niche in the Temple of poetical Fame; his name will be kept alive in the popular mind by the correspondence of
Lord Byron, Sir Walter Scott, Southey, and of others among the best of his literary contemporaries.

≪ PREV NEXT ≫