Captain Medwin’s Account of Mr. ShelleyMorning ChronicleAnonymous Markup and editing by David Hill Radcliffe Completed March 2009 MorningChron.1824.Medwin Center for Applied Technologies in the Humanities Virginia Tech
Published under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
License
Lord Byron and his Times: http://lordbyron.org
Captain Medwin’s Account of Mr. ShelleyMorning ChronicleLondon9 November 182417,336
Any dashes occurring in line breaks have been removed.
Obvious and unambiguous compositors’ errors have been silently corrected.
NINES categories for Genre and Material Form at
http://www.performantsoftware.com/nines_wiki/index.php/Submitting_RDF#.3Cnines:genre.3E on
2009-02-26BibliographyBook HistoryCollectionCriticismDramaEphemeraFictionHumorLawLettersLife WritingHistoryManuscriptNonfictionPeriodicalPoliticsReference WorksPoetryReligionReviewTranslationTravel
THE MORNING CHRONICLE.
No. 17,336.LONDON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1824. Price Sevenpence.
CAPTAIN MEDWIN’S ACCOUNT of Mr. SHELLEY.
What man has met another within the last few weeks, and has not asked him
“Have you seen Medwin’s
book?” And who will venture to answer “No?” He might as soon
acknowledge the not having ready Waverley!
Every one is expected to have read “Medwin’s book.” It
is the general topic of conversation; one person reprobates the publication altogether, and
declares he can give no credit to one who has betrayed the confidence of a friend; another
thinks the thing authorized by the intense interest taken in all that relates to so
extraordinary a genius, while a third blames the author, and at the same time thanks his stars
that the author has merited the blame.
One of the many persons mentioned in this volume is Mr.
Murray, and he is mentioned not only unhandsomely, but ambiguously. Asterisks
are introduced, after a half sentence, which serve (like a shrug of the shoulders, and an
elevation of the brows, in conversation) to imply, that more is meant than can be uttered.
Intended to look like mercy; nothing can be more severe.
Mr. Murray has taken proper notice of this. The former
question is superseded by a second, and it is now asked "Have you seen
Murray’spamphlet?" Mr. Murray has fully refuted every objection and
insinuation against him, and appears to have acted not only justly, but nobly, towards
Lord Byron.
The world will be sorry to see his Lordship contradict himself as he does in
these two publications; but without questioning Captain
Medwin’s veracity, may it not be doubted whether he has not, upon some
occasions, mistaken the sense of his Lordship’s words, and thus unconsciously
misrepresented them? It is not likely that conversations written from memory, should be given
word for word as they were uttered. There is the more reason to
suppose that Captain Medwin may not have been sufficiently circumspect, on
this point, as he has certainly fallen into several errors in the short memoir he has given of
Mr. Shelley in the notes. This memoir contains about
ten pages, and nearly as many errors.
Captain Medwin tells us that “his first visit to
Italy was short, for he was soon called to England by his wife’s melancholy fate.”
The fact is, that Mr. Shelley’s return to this
country preceded the unhappy event, and had no connection with it whatever. Again, we are told
that it was during his residence in Buckinghamshire, that he wrote his ‘Alastor, or the Spirit of Solitude.’"
The writer of this letter had the pleasure of reading that poem in print, before the author went to Buckinghamshire.
Captain Medwin proceeds to inform us, that Mr. Shelley wrote the “Revolt of Islam” in Italy, after his return to that
country. On the contrary, this was the poem written in Buckinghamshire, and it was published
before he went to Italy the second time. In giving the date of the publication of ‘Rosalind and Helen,’ he is equally
incorrect.
It may be answered, that these are only errors of date, and are of no importance;
but, beside that errors of date may be of incalculable importance; it may very fairly be
supposed that a person, who, writing with the confidence of absolute knowledge, shews himself,
in the course of a few pages, to be, in so many instances, misinformed; may have written upon
too uncertain a foundation in many others.
The writer has by no means pointed out all the errors he has detected in this
brief memoir, because, though he knows Capt. Medwin to
be wrong, he is not sure that he could accurately correct them. He has
mentioned those only, which he could correct with certainty.
There is a mistake (of no other importance than for the trouble it may occasion
to inquirers for the work) in the title of one of Mr.
Shelley’s novels—written at school, it should be Zastrozzi.