Sir,—I never did an act in my life that I am afraid to acknowledge, and as I am the sole and therefore unassisted Editor of the Apocryphal New Testament, I feel no more hesitation in avowing it, than difficulty in justifying it.

Had the Quarterly Review confined its strictures to an examination of the book, I should have had no reason to address you thus; but a week's reflection has confirmed the first impression with which I read the attack upon me personally in your last Number; and I think, upon a re-perusal, you must feel that the article is of such a character as to authorise me in requesting the name of my unknown assailant.

The Reviewer himself professes so warm an indigna-

698

THE EXAMINER.

tion at a “dastard behind,” that he will of course be eager to come forward, and thus avoid the imputation of being one himself, or perhaps in your case, as in mine, there may be no “dastard” behind, and if so, you will not refuse the opportunity I now offer you of raising yourself from the degradation of a concealed, to the respectability of an open assailant.