Lord Byron and Mr. Leigh HuntMorning ChronicleLeigh Hunt Markup and editing by David Hill Radcliffe Completed July 2008 LeHunt.1828.LB2 Center for Applied Technologies in the Humanities Virginia Tech
Published under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
License
Lord Byron and his Times: http://lordbyron.org
Lord Byron and Mr. Leigh HuntMorning ChronicleHunt, Leigh, 1784-1859London25 January 182818,210
Any dashes occurring in line breaks have been removed.
Obvious and unambiguous compositors’ errors have been silently corrected.
NINES categories for Genre and Material Form at
http://www.performantsoftware.com/nines_wiki/index.php/Submitting_RDF#.3Cnines:genre.3E on
2009-02-26BibliographyBook HistoryCollectionCriticismDramaEphemeraFictionHumorLawLettersLife WritingHistoryManuscriptNonfictionPeriodicalPoliticsReference WorksPoetryReligionReviewTranslationTravel
The Morning Chronicle.
Number 18,210.]LONDON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 25, 1828.[Price Sevenpence.
LORD BYRON AND MR. LEIGH HUNT.TO THE EDITOR OF THE MORNING CHRONICLE.
Sir, I must trouble you once more on the subject of the partial
extracts from my book, which have given rise to so much misconception.A person for whom I have great respect (and whose name I enclose for your
private knowledge), has sent me a message by a kinsman, informing me, that from one of the
passages of those extracts, a conclusion has been drawn by some, that I meant to charge
Lord Byron with “cowardice.” My
informant does not see the passage in the same light himself. He does not suppose that I
meant it to be so construed. But such, he tells me, is the impression with some; and he
accordingly recommends me to cancel it in the next edition.
I cannot do that—desirous as I should be of falling in with the least
intimations of the person in question. But I can add a note, referring to the letter which I am
now writing, and which shall appear at the end of the book, and I can explain myself on the
subject in the mean time. I will quote the passage, that it may not be taken by any that have
not seen it, for more than it is. Furthermore, a previous paragraph or two shall be added, that
the quotation may not tell more against his Lordship in any respect, than was intended. The
passage alluded to is in the second part of what follows:—
“Mr. Shelley said of him (Lord B.)
that he never made you laugh to your own content. This, however, was said latterly, after my
friend had been disappointed by a close intimacy. Mr. Shelley’s
opinion of his natural powers, in every respect, was great; and there is reason to believe,
that Lord Byron never talked with any man to so much purpose as he did
with him. He looked upon him as his most admiring listener, and probably was never less under
the influence of affectation. If he could have got rid of this and his title, he would have
talked like a man; not like a mere man of the town, or a great spoilt schoolboy. It is not to
be concluded, that his jokes were not now and then very happy; or that admirers of his
Lordship, who paid him visits, did not often go away more admiring. I am speaking of his
conversation in general, and of the impression it made upon you, compared with what was to be
expected from a man of wit and experience.
“He had a delicate white hand, of which he was proud; and he attracted
attention to it by rings. He thought a hand of this description almost the only mark remaining
now-a-days of a gentleman; of which it certainly is not, nor of a lady either; though a coarse
one implies handiwork. He often appeared holding a handkerchief, upon which his jewelled
fingers lay imbedded, as in a picture. He was as fond of fine linen, as a quaker; and had the
remnant of his hair oiled and trimmed with all the anxiety of a Sardanapalus.
“The visible character to which this effeminacy gave rise appears to have
indicated itself as early as his travels in the Levant, where the
Grand Signior is said to have taken him for a woman in disguise. But he had
tastes of a more masculine description. He was fond of swimming to the last, and used to push
out to a good distance in the Gulf of Genoa. He was also, as I have
before mentioned, a good horseman; & he liked to have a great dog or two about him, which
is not a habit observable in timid men. Yet I doubt greatly whether he was a man of courage. I
suspect that personal anxiety, coming upon a constitution unwisely treated, had no small hand
in hastening his death in Greece. The story of his bold behaviour at sea in a voyage to
Sicily, and of Mr. Shelley’s timidity, is
just reversing what I conceive would have been the real state of the matter, had the voyage
taken place. The account is an impudent fiction. Nevertheless, he volunteered voyages by sea,
when he might have eschewed them; and yet the same man never got into a coach without being
afraid. In short, he was the contradiction his father and mother had made him.”
I feel bound, Sir, to make some observations on this passage, though as far as
itself is concerned, I would rather leave it to the reflection of your readers. I would only
repeat, that [in] this, as in any other instance, be the opinion of a passage [what] it may, no
final judgment ought to be formed of what is extracted, and of the spirit in which it was
written, without [an] acquaintance with the book itself. It will then be seen, if I am not
mistaken, that whatever may have been my doubts on this matter, they applied only to the latter
part of Lord Byron’s life, and to what he had made
himself by an unwise treatment of his constitution; for effeminacy is, in itself, no disproof
of the existence of courage. Cæsar himself began with
being a dandy, and with scratching the top of his head with the tip of one of his fingers, that
he might not displace the curls.* But if Cæsar had been a poet as
well as a man of pleasure, and circumstances had led him into a sedentary mode of life, it
would not have been easy to say what the crucifier of the pirates would have become, under the
united influence of pleasure and pain, of illness and imagination. Indeed, Sir, now that I call
to mind one thing about Lord Byron, as I write this very passage, and
think what even his lame foot might have done to injure the “energetic” person I
have described in a former part of my book, I am forced to use a very strong word (truth must
help me out with it); but I feel as if I ought to blush for not having secreted my doubts on
this point. There was, at all events, no necessity to mention them. I might fairly have let
them remain among other things, which I did not think it warrantable to speak of. Others may
even know him to be a man of courage; and I have nothing to oppose to their knowledge. But
Lord Byron has been so treated in all quarters, as a man of whom every
thing was to be said—gifting him, as it were, with the privileges of an ancient, and
making the least thing in his character, bad or good, a matter of dispassionate or rather
passionate curiosity, that a biographer is involuntarily led to speculate more upon him than he
would upon another person; and I trust, whatever my spleen may have been sometimes, it is not
very visible in the passages here quoted, and that the reader will do me the justice of
supposing that the ardour of my portrait-painting was upon me, more than any other feeling.
After all, Sir, my doubt was only a doubt, however strongly
expressed. I express doubts on the other side; I sum up all by saying that he was a
“contradiction;” and the instances I put, on either side, apply only to physical
courage. If I doubt whether circumstances had left him enough of this to hinder him from
becoming a victim to a state of protracted anxiety, exasperated by illness, and if have too
good reason to know that he wanted moral courage enough to face a part of society upon certain
points, I doubt not, that at any time of life, he had quite sufficient to obey the calls of his
favourite impulses, and to dare any thing for their sake, as long as he could have been kept in
action; and this perhaps, in sedentary and sophisticated times like the present, is as much
many men would require to be conceded them. Above all, Sir, I pretend to little more myself;
and only to that more, as far as endurance is concerned, and inasmuch as the circumstances of
my life have led me to have greater views of what ought to be endured for mankind. With regard
to physical courage, I lay claim, in some respects, to less than I have attributed to Lord Byron. If the readers who have formed that judgment of me
solely by the partial extracts, had seen my book, they would have there found how little I make
pretensions to the reverse. In a family of men remarkable for their bravery, I am in that
respect the only timid person. Delicacy of organization, anxious rearing by a mother whose
health had been shattered by adversity, a life studious, yet full of emotion, and cares and
illnesses of no common sort, have forced me to confess to myself, on more than one occasion,
that if I had no courage but what resulted from health and complexion, I should be at the mercy
of every fear that came across me. I have great animal spirits, subject, during ill health, to
as great incursions of melancholy; but as the former mount up at the least aspect of happiness,
so a dread or a tender thought would bring in the latter to unman me on graver occasions, if I
had not learnt the art of strengthening myself by my very sympathies, and enlarging them till
the crowd supported me. The first incursions of danger alarm and perplex me. After a
morning’s writing I shall occasionally be so sensitive (you will excuse these personal
details, considering the origin of them), that my fingers’ ends will tremble as if I had
been a sot; and my head has been so tried altogether, that I sometimes cannot bear the pressure
of a hand upon it. When I was at sea, not living very wisely, and having my imagination
softened and detained in embrace by some peculiar circumstances, I felt as if I grew with
fragile uneasiness. After this, Sir, it may be permitted me to say, nevertheless, that owing to
some opinions I entertain, I have great moral courage. I trust I have given more than one proof
of it in the course of my life; and I cannot conceive the case in which my sense of what was
due to a generous notion of right and justice could be put to the test, and anything induce me
to desert it. Enable me only to identify myself with the common good, and allow me a pale face
and a little reflection, and I have thoughts that would support me under any hazard, moral or
personal.
Nevertheless, Sir, I felt so strongly the delicacy of the [way] I had written, in
these and many other respects, and [was] anxious not be looked upon as claiming merit to
myself, [in] contrast with any thing I had said of others, that if my [book]seller had not put a delay upon it in the first
instance, [the] readers of the first edition of my work would have seen a [con]vincing proof of
my earnestness on that point, in what I [had] called “An Attempt of the Author to
estimate his own [Charac]ter.” In this, I had spoken to the very point before us, [in a]
way more startling than that in which I have mentioned [Lord]
Byron, and such as upon second thoughts I thought fit [not] to publish at the
moment, nor retain altogether. It might [have] done me an injustice. But the substance of it
you have [been] reading; and the remainder of the Estimate will appear, [to]gether with this
Letter, at the end of the Second Edition [forth]coming; both of them, I trust, containing
sufficient proof, [that] in being led by circumstances to draw the mixed character [of] other
men, I was not inclined to spare my own. It was a [thought] that had more pain in it, than any
reputation of candour [could] pay me for, short of the considerations I have mentioned, [that]
of the good, I think, which sincerity would do the world; [and] though I concede always, that
some reserve of the [self-love] with which nature has kindly endowed us, is to be found [at
the] bottom of the nicest self-inspections, and that others [may] know me better than myself
even from my admissions, it [would] be a very difficult thing to persuade me, that my love of
[truth] has not a great deal of humanity in it, and that I am [as] ready to think the best of
what is good in an enemy, as to [resist] confounding it with what is ill and
unhandsome.—I am, [Sir] with many apologies for this long and personal letter, [your]
obliged and sincere servant,
LEIGH HUNT.
* You recollect the picture Cicero gives of
him, as he called him to mind at that time of life; adding his astonishment, that such a
person should have subverted the Roman Empire.